How to question the police

Uploaded to Youtube on Aug 14, 2011

Police lying again they tried and failed to make me submit to their deceit just bullys. my opinion concerning this satanic organisation is based on what i have observed experienced and what i feel. The coercive techniques used against us to trick us and trap us just with the words they use is so wrong. decietful, unlawfull and basically criminal. we end up incriminating ourselves without realising.

Until i cause any harm injury or loss to another then i am innocent, free. as i am prepared to die for what i feel is right and do not fear no more with this satanic system which has indoctrinated us not educated us. until others experience this realisation then organisations like this will continue to use their mind manipulation techniques on all of us. just consider precautionary principle law of probabilities and statistical analysis and you will be closer to realising something maybe you have not realised yet just my opinion based on what i feel.

[iframe]<iframe width=”640″ height=”480″ src=”” frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen></iframe>[/iframe]


Tagged : / / /

CBC with Robert Menard & the Freeman Movement

Published on Youtube on Mar 1, 2012

A new but expanding group called the Freeman-on-the-Land has caught the attention of Canadian police because of the violent activity of associated groups in other countries.

Some call the Freemen a harmless fringe movement. However, as The National’s Adrienne Arsenault reports, the group may be larger and, for some, more worrying than it appears.

If you want to learn more about the World Freeman Society, visit our site at:
Or the Public Forums where 1000’s of people ask questions that Government can’t answer every day:

The Legal Definition of Freeman, according to Blacks Law can be found on our online version of Black’s Law located here:

Bouviers Law states:
FREEMAN. One who is in the enjoyment of the right to do whatever he pleases,
not forbidden by law. One in the possession of the civil rights enjoyed by,
the people generally. 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 164. See 6 Watts, 556:

We would like to add here that nowhere do Freeman from the World Freeman Society Claim they are Sovereign Citizens.
There is no such thing, it’s an oxy-moron, and has as much substance as this CBC pice of propaganda.

[iframe]<iframe width=”640″ height=”360″ src=”” frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen></iframe>[/iframe]


Tagged : / / /

Know Your Rights – Stop Stopping Me – Im Not Obliged

Uploaded to Youtube on Jan 26, 2012

Perfect Example Of Standing Up For Your Rights.

Learn What Your Inalienable Rights Are And Stand Up For Your Self. Policemen Committing assault.

Keep your Eyes on Your Monitors For: but for the meantime come check out our Facebook page or hit us up on Twitter!/ReclaimReality

‘The Best Way To Predict Your Future Is To Create Your Own”

[iframe]<iframe width=”640″ height=”480″ src=”” frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen></iframe>[/iframe]


Tagged : /

Sovereign freeman in court bench Trial – Full Audio

Published on Youtube on Jun 12, 2012

Every system of civilized law must have two characteristics: Remedy and Recourse. Remedy is a way to get out from under that law. The Recourse is if you have been damaged under the law, you can recover your loss. The Common Law, the Law of Merchants, and even the Uniform Commercial Code all have remedy and recourse, but for a long time we could not find it. If you go to a law library and ask to see the Uniform Commercial Code, they will show you a shelf of books completely filled with the Uniform Commercial Code. When you pick up one volume and start to read it, it will seem to have been intentionally written to be confusing. It took us a long time to discover where the Remedy and Recourse are found in the UCC. They are found right in the first volume, at 1-207 and 1-103.

The making of a valid Reservation of Rights preserves whatever rights the person then possesses, and prevents the loss of such rights by application of concepts of waiver or estoppel. (UCC 1-207.7) It is important to remember when we go into a court, that we are in a commercial, international jurisdiction. If we go into court and say, “I DEMAND MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS,” the judge will most likely say, “You mention the Constitution again, and I’ll find you in contempt of court!” Then we don’t understand how he can do that. Hasn’t he sworn to uphold the Constitution? The rule here is: you cannot be charged under one jurisdiction, and defend under another. For example, if the French government came to you and asked where you filed your French income tax in a certain year, do you go to the French government and say, “I demand my Constitutional Rights?” No. The proper answer is: THE LAW DOESN’T APPLY TO ME–I’M NOT A FRENCHMAN.

You must make your reservation of rights under the jurisdiction in which you are charged–not under some other jurisdiction. So in a UCC court, you must claim your reservation of rights under the U.C.C. 1-207. UCC 1-207 goes on to say: When a waivable right or claim is involved, the failure to make a reservation thereof, causes a loss of the right, and bars its assertion at a later date. (UCC 1-207.9) You have to make your claim known early. Further, it says: The Sufficiency of the Reservation–Any expression indicating an intention to reserve rights, is sufficient, such as “without prejudice”. (UCC 1-207.4) Whenever you sign any legal paper that deals with Federal Reserve Notes–in any way, shape or manner–under your signature write: Without Prejudice UCC 1-207. This reserves your rights.

You can show, at 1-207.4, that you have sufficiently reserved your rights. It is very important to understand just what this means. For example, one man who used this in regard to a traffic ticket was asked by the judge just what he meant by writing -without prejudice UCC 1-207′ on his statement to the court. He had not tried to understand the concepts involved. He only wanted to use it to get out of the ticket. He did not know what it meant. When the judge asked him what he meant by signing in that way, he told the judge that he was not prejudiced against anyone…. The judge knew that the man had no idea what it meant, and he lost the case. You must know what it means.


When you use -without prejudice’ UCC 1-207 in connection with your signature, you are saying: -I reserve my right not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that I did not enter knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally. And furthermore, I do not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement.’ What is the compelled performance of an unrevealed commercial agreement? When you use Federal Reserve Notes instead of silver dollars, is it voluntary? No. There is no lawful money, so you have to use Federal Reserve Notes–you have to accept the benefit.

The government has given you the benefit to discharge your debts with limited liability, and you don’t have to pay your debts. How nice they are! But if you did not reserve your rights under 1-207.7, you are compelled to accept the benefit, and are therefore obligated to obey every statute, ordinance and regulation of the government, at all levels of government–federal, state and local. If you understand this, you will be able to explain it to the judge when he asks. And he will ask, so be prepared to explain it to the court. You will also need to understand UCC 1-103–the argument and recourse. If you want to understand this fully, go to a law library and photocopy these two sections from the UCC. It is important to get the Anderson edition. Some of the law libraries will only have the West Publishing version, and it is very difficult to understand. In Anderson, it is broken down with decimals into ten parts and, most importantly, it is written in plain English.

[iframe]<iframe width=”640″ height=”360″ src=”″ frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen></iframe>[/iframe]


Tagged : / /